Wednesday, July 19, 2006

 

July 17 (Camouflage) - Today in the News

Camouflage

Smaller, irregular units of scouts in the 18th century were the first to adopt colors in drab shades of brown and green. Major armies retained their color until convinced otherwise. The British in India in 1857 were forced by casualties to dye their red tunics to neutral tones, initially a muddy tan called khaki (from the Urdu word for 'dusty'). This was only a temporary measure. It became standard in Indian service in the 1880s, but it was not until the Second Boer War that, in 1902, the uniforms of the entire British army were standardised on this dun tone for battledress.

The United States was quick to follow the British, going khaki in the same year. Russia followed, partially, in 1908. The Italian army used grigio-verde ("grey-green") in the Alps from 1906 and across the army from 1909. The Germans adopted feldgrau ("field grey") in 1910.

Other armies retained brighter colors. At the beginning of World War I the French experienced heavy losses because the troops wore red (garance) trousers as part of their uniform. This was changed in early 1915, partly due to casualties and partly because the red dye was manufactured in Germany. The French army also adopted a new "horizon blue" jacket. The Belgian army started using khaki uniforms in 1915.


The Bronze Horseman camouflaged from the German aircraft during the Siege of Leningrad (August 8, 1941).The French also established a Section de Camouflage (Camouflage Department) in 1915, briefly headed by Eugene Corbin and then by Lucien-Victor Guirand de Sc vola. The camouflage experts were, for the most part, painters, sculptors, theatre set artists and such. Technological constraints meant that patterned camouflage uniforms were not mass manufactured during WW I. Each patterned uniform was hand-painted, and so restricted to snipers, forward artillery observers, and other exposed individuals. More effort was put into concealing larger pieces of equipment and important structures. By mid-1915 the French section had four workshops - one in Paris and three nearer the front - mainly producing camouflage netting and painted canvas. Netting quickly moved from wire and fabric to use raffia, hessian, and cocoa - the integration of natural materials was always recommended.

Units of Camouflage who were artists, designers, or architects in civilian life were also largely used by the forces of the United Kingdom (Camouflage Section established in late 1916 based at Wimereux) and the US (New York Camouflage Society established in April 1917, official Company A, 40th Engineers set up in January 1918 and the Women's Reserve Camouflage Corps) and to a lesser extent by Germany (from 1917, see, for example, Lozenge - possibly the earliest printed camouflage), Italy (Laboratorio di mascheramento established in 1917), Belgium and Russia. The word camouflage first entered the English language in 1917.

Camouflage added to helmets was unofficially popular, but these were not mass-produced until the Germans began in 1916 to issue stahlhelme (steel helmets) in green, brown, or ochre. Mass-produced patterned, reversible, cloth covers were also issued shortly before the end of the war, although hand-made examples were in use from late 1914. Net covering was also examined, either fitted with natural vegetation or with colored fabric strips called scrim.

Specialist troops, notably snipers, could be supplied with various items of camouflage, including patterned veils for the head and gun, hand-painted overalls and scrim covered netting or sacking - an adaptation of the rag camouflage used in Scotland by anti-poaching wardens, gillies, the first ghillie suits.


Two HMMWVs, one in desert "camouflage", one in woodland.The first mass produced military camouflage material was the Italian telo mimetico ("mimetic cloth") pattern of 1929, used to cover a shelter-half (telo tenda), an idea copied by the Germans in 1931. With mass-production of patterned fabrics possible, they became far more common on individual soldiers in WW II. Initially patterning was uncommon, a sign of elite units, to the extent that captured camouflage uniforms would be often 'recycled' by an enemy. The Red Army issued "amoeba" disruptive pattern suits to snipers from 1937 and all-white ZMK top-garments the following year, but it was not until hostilities began that more patterns were used.

The Germans had experimented before the war and some army units used "splinter" pattern camouflage. Waffen-SS combat units experimented with various patterns, including palmenmuster ("palm pattern"), sumpfmuster ("swamp pattern"), erbsenmuster ("pea pattern"), and also telo mimetico ("mimetic cloth") using fabric seized from the Italians in 1943 - the Leibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler division often wore this pattern.

The British did not use disruptive-pattern uniforms until 1942, with the hand-painted Denison smock for paratroopers, followed in 1943 with a similar style M42 garment.


A Royal Norwegian Navy craft, in a splinter camouflage pattern.The US Corps of Engineers began wide-ranging experiments in 1940, but little official notice was taken until 1942 when General MacArthur demanded 150,000 jungle camouflage uniforms. A 1940 design, dubbed "frog-skin", was chosen and issued as a reversible beach/jungle coverall - soon changed to a two-part jacket and trousers. It was first issued to the US Marines fighting on the Solomon Islands. Battle-field experience showed that pattern was unsuitable for moving troops and production was halted in 1944 with a return to standard single-tone uniforms.

With the return of war camouflage sections were revived. The British set up the (camouflage) Development and Training Centre in 1940 at Farnham Castle, Surrey. Early staff included artists from the Industrial Camouflage Research Unit such as Roland Penrose and Frederick Gore, and the stage magician Jasper Maskelyne (later famous for his camouflage work in the North African campaign).

From 1978 to the early 1980s, the American 2d Armored Cavalry Regiment stationed in Europe used a digital camouflage pattern on its vehicles. During 1979 and 1980 the Australian Army experimented with digital camouflage on helicopters. More recently, battledress in digital camouflage patterns has been adopted by the Canadian Army and Air Force (CADPAT), the United States Marine Corps (MARPAT), and much of the military of Jordan.

-

July 17 - Today in the News

  1. Stopping Gun Confiscation


July 14 - Today in the News

First, it is all over the place that an amendment to the Homeland Security Dept. appropriations bill has been passed to prevent confiscations of firearms. Senate Amendment 4615 was passed by a vote of 84 - 16 yesterday. S.A.4615 prevents HSD budget from being used to confiscate legally owned guns in emergency situations.

Entries on the amendment:

And in other news:



Another Lautenberg Victim

A few days ago I recieved the following email. For readability, I have converted it to mixed case, and corrected some of the spelling and punctuation.

It is obvious that this gentleman has made life choices that some of us would not. On the flip side, those choices should not preclude him from options otherwise available to him.

I leave his story for your consideration with one question: how have stories like this impacted our military readiness?

About five years ago I was arrested and cite released for a 243 e 1, which is a misdemeanor battery on spouse.
I have never hit a woman. And the arresting officer said that in a situation like this one, someone has to go to jail," because if I dont and something worse happens they could be sued".
When she called the police on me it was because I was talking to the girl next door. She was just trying to get even with me for not giving her enough attention.
She called the police from the house which my parents had bought for us so instead of me leaving before they arrived I had nothing to hide and nothing to fear considering I didnt hit her so I stuck around to talk to them.
I was shocked when they wouldnt hear my side and took me to jail. I was released about five hours later and was given a court date.
When I went to court the judge asked if I had a lawyer I said no and said I would try to find one.
After talking to a lawyer he said he would go to trial for me, but it would cost five thousand dollars. I did not have that kind of money considering I was only 19. She was 24 with 4 kids and I had already asked my parents to help me find a place to stay with the kids and there mother. So I did not want to bother them for another five thousand for attorney fees. The lawyer had told me it was just a misdemeanor no big deal so I took the charge.
We went to court many times for child support and custody issues. I eventually was awarded sole physical custody of the kids. She was given supervised visits and was ordered to check her self in the cider house a drug rehab for treatment. I have raised our 2 daughters with no help from her.
She currently is incarcerated at a drug rehab she has had many run ins with the law and thats how she ended up there. She did not want to go and did not do so because the family court ordered.
Her mother is a government employee employeed with the s.b. sherriffs dept. And pulled some strings so that she would not go to jail.
I have been working hard raising the kids and working while she has been doing neither.
I have married to my current wife and recently interested in joining the armed forces so we may have all the rewards and benefits from the armed forces but when I was all set and ready for a contract I was informed I was disqualified because of the Lautenberg Amendment. So, because I did not have the money to fight that misdemeanor charge, the hopes for a better life for my family once again seem out of reach.


July 12 - Today in the News
  1. Florida Crime Lowest Since 1971
  2. Teaching The Second Amendment
  3. Nebraska: Lincoln Jumps The Gun On Debate
  4. U.N. Misfires; U.S. Protects Its Gun Rights
  5. D.C. Police Chief Declares Crime Emergency


July 13 - Today in the News
  1. Tourist Attacks Prompt Declaration of D.C. Crime Emergency
  2. Carry Considered In Omaha
  3. California: Groups Plan Suit Over Lead Ammo
  4. What You Don`t Know Can Hurt You
  • Of Arms and the Law informs us that there is a Vitter Amendment. First impression is that it sounds like a Senate version of H.R.5013, the Disaster Recovery Personal Protection Act of 2006. The NRA considers this legislation a priority. Research to begin.
  • PawPaw's House fisks the media and New Orleans PD in Oh, Please!
  • Pro-Gun Progressive asks Rudy in ‘08? Apparently he is considered left of McCain. But who cares. He supports firearm registration. Anybody who is electable in NYC is not getting my vote.
  • Repeal the Lautenberg Amendment, aka, section 658 of Public Law 104-208 has Another Lautenberg Story.....
  • And Johns Hopkins says Lautenberg Amendment has NO affect on DV Homicide. You need to read the report carefully. In only one sentence does the report differentiate misdemeanants . Given that felons were prohibitted persons before Lautenberg, the report seems to show the LA as a waste of effort.
  • SayUncle blogs The WaPo Editorializes On Gun Laws.
  • And goes to Georgia in Guns and privacy.
  • Thank G-d for Guns
  1. Mayor 'Loonberg' quacks about new gun laws
  2. Thai teachers carry arms, teach U.S. a lesson
  3. Sunshine State sheds light on solutions to crime


July 19 - Today in the News
  1. A Defendable Gun Bill
  2. Clinton`s $22 Million War Chest
  3. Knowledge And Democracy
  4. Carry Will Be Legal In Omaha
  5. Halting Global Tax Tyranny
  6. Apprentice Hunter Program Hits Bull`s-Eye - This site is not about hunting or for hunters specifically, but increasing the population comfortable with guns can only be a good thing.


July 18 - Today in the News
  1. Kentucky Firearm License Changes Begin
  2. America`s Other Mayor



Comments: Post a Comment



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?