Sunday, August 08, 2010

 

In every case, the part(s) are installed into a semi-automatic gun, and without any alteration to the semi-auto gun's receiver, the new part(s) will allow the gun to fire as a machine gun. As a general rule a sear conversion is less desirable than an original gun, or a registered receiver conversion. This is because if the registered part breaks or wears out it cannot be replaced, only repaired, if possible. BATF considers replacing it with a new part to be the new manufacture of a machine gun, and a civilian could not own it, as it would have been made after the 1986 ban. This wear/breakage thing is also true of the receiver on a gun where that is the registered part, but in general the receiver is less subject to wear or breakage than a small part, like a sear. Being larger, a receiver may also be easier to repair. The sear conversion will most likely not be just like the factory machine gun version; it will be working in the semi-auto version of the gun. A registered receiver conversion can (and should, but isn't always) be mechanically identical to the original full auto version of the gun, and factory spare parts may be used. Some sear conversions require altered parts, in addition to the registered sear.

-

Patches
Monkey Made Morale Patches ... If you are going to bang one, you might as well bang them all. Product Details

Rifles
MIL-SPEC MONKEY ... Sunday, 08 July 2007 04:11 This area will be for displaying long barrel firearms considered rifles or carbines.

WWJBD?
What Would Jack Bauer Do?

T-shirts
T-shirt designs ... *Updated 4-5-2010* Finally got a Show Cart button up top when ready to checkout.

UCP SUCKS (Universal Camo Pattern) RANT
MIL-SPEC MONKEY ... Sunday, 25 February 2007 08:00 UCP SUCKS (Universal Camo Pattern) RANT:-For starters I have to breakdown all the acronyms just to make sure you know what the hell I ...

Comments: Post a Comment



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?